The Alchemist

The Alchemist blog is a forum to help companies with innovative technologies obtain federal government funding. Its focus is on the DoD Rapid Innovation Program,defense appropriations and other DoD SBIR Phase III funding opportunities. We encourage you to join in the conversation with your comments and insights. For timely updates on the new DoD Rapid Innovation Program, subscribe to our blog.

Add to Technorati Favorites

The Alchemist

The Alchemist blog is a forum to help companies with innovative technologies obtain federal government funding. Its focus is on the DoD Rapid Innovation Program,defense appropriations and other DoD SBIR Phase III funding opportunities. We encourage you to join in the conversation with your comments and insights. For timely updates on the new DoD Rapid Innovation Program, subscribe to our blog.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Location: Blogs>    
Posted by: Alan Dillingham Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:20 AM
According to analysis done by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, appropriations bills passed by Congress for fiscal 2008 fiscal year, contained nearly $4.5 billion in Congressional earmarked projects for research and development. $3.5 billion of these earmarks, nearly 80%, were contained in the defense bill. All told, roughly one quarter of all Congressional go to r&d projects.
 
This is a big number and presents unique opportunities for companies with new technology.
 
However, it would be a mistake to view this amount of Congressional funding as disruptive to our national technology efforts, since it represents only a little over 3 percent of the total federal spending on research and development. 
 
And when you take into account, the fact that Congress added $2.5 billion more for research and development than the President had originally requested, that means that less than 1.5% of the President’s budget request for r&d had to be cut to make room for these earmarks. 
 
It’s entirely possible that Congressional appropriators were able to find 1.5% of waste in the President’s budget request to pay for these earmarks – unless, of course, you believe that federal agencies and the Bush Administration are the font of all wisdom in determining how funding for technology should be spent.
 
There are a number of other fascinating items in the AAAS analysis, that I’ll be digging out in later posts.
Permalink |  Trackback

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment   Cancel 

Search the Alchemist Blog

Search the Alchemist Blog

© 2011 Alchemy Government Solutions, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

© 2011 Alchemy Government Solutions, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Register  Login